Krishna Lal Saraf v. The Chairman Cum Chief Managing Director Cum Chief Engineer And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2933 of 2018 ====================================================== Krishna Lal Saraf, son of Late Ram Jeewan Saraf, resident of 707/708, Gagan Apartment, B- Block, Exhibition Road, Patna- 800001. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Chairman Cum Chief Managing Director Cum Chief Engineer (PESU), South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Vidhut Bhawan, Patna, Bihar.
2. The Managing Director, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Vidhut Bhawan, Patna, Bihar.
3. The Electricity Executive Engineer, Electricity Supply Division, Dak Bunglow Road, PESU, Patna.
4. Additional Electric Engineer (Revenue) Electricity Supply Division, Dak Bunglow Road, PESU, Patna.
5. Prabu Nath Kumar Ram @ Prabu Nath Kumar Azad, Director of M/s. Pratik Raj Prerna Publication Pvt. Ltd., CC/45, PC Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna- 20.
6. Smt. Anju Kumari, Director of M/s Pratik Raj Prerna Publication Pvt. Ltd., CC/45, P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna- 20.
7. M/s. Pratik Raj Prerna Publication Pvt. Ltd., CC/45, PC Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna- 20.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh For Power company : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan : Mr. Niraj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-10-2018 The respondent-South Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. has filed a supplementary counter affidavit and in paragraph no. 6, it has been stated that the electricity connection of the respondents no. 6 to 8 has been disconnected on 24.10.2018. In such view of the matter, nothing survives in the present writ petition for adjudication and the learned counsel
Patna High Court CWJC No.2933 of 2018 (2) dt.29-10-2018 2/2 appearing for the petitioner also does not wish to press the writ petition.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U