Ramekbal Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7806 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-582 Year-2021 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

RAMEKBAL SAHANI son of Mahanth Sahani Resident of village - Tikuliya Dab Tola, P.S. - Muffasil, District - East Champaran. 2.

Ramnath Sahani S/o Bhauch Sahani Resident of village - Tikuliya Dab Tola, P.S. - Muffasil, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Motihari Muffasil P.S. Case No. 582 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections-30(a)(b), 32, 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 60 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against them. They have been falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7806 of 2022(2) dt.25-02-2022 2/2 implicated in the present case. It is alleged that 60 litres wine is recovered by side of the bank of the river. The names of the petitioners have transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by local chowkidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned learned Special Judge, Excise, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 582 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T