Patna High CourtMJC/251/2017disposed

Urmila Kumari v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govern

2017-10-18Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.251 of 2017 (3) dt.18-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.251 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8978 of 2016 ====================================================== Urmila Kumari, Daughter of Shri Tukkar Prasad, Wife of Late Diwakar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Sahwazpur, Post Office- Habib Nagar, Police StationHussainganj, District- Siwan, Assistant Teacher, Govt. Upgraded Middle School Sareya Hindi, Block- Hussainganj, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Ramchandra Tuddu, the Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Mahendra Kumar, the District Magistrate, Siwan.

4. Mr. Vishwanath Vishwakarma, the District Education Officer, Siwan.

5. Mr. Raj Kumar Rai, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan.

6. Mr. Md. Mohiuddin, the Block Education Officer, Hussainganj, DistrictSiwan.

7. Mr. Arvind Kumar, the Headmaster-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Upgraded Middle School Sareya Hindi, Block- Hussainganj, DistrictSiwan. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Learned counsel for the parties are present.

In view of the order passed by the District Programme Officer, Siwan bearing Memo No.4117 dated 17.10.2017 placed on record at Annexure 'A' to the show cause the order passed by this Court on the writ petition stands complied and even if it does not suit the petitioner the remedy would lie to question the same before the proper forum by filing an appropriate application. The petitioner, if so advised, may take recourse to the same.

The contempt application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U