Raja @ Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18321 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2020 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAJA @ RAJA KUMAR S/O ASHOK YADAV R/O NAYATOLA JURABGANJ, P.S.-KODHA, DISTRICT-KATIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-10-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No.199 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 356, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case in short is that the money bag of the informant, in which Rs.95000/- were kept has been snatched away by two persons who came from a motorcycle. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No offence as alleged has ever taken place. He has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion only. He is not named in the FIR nor apprehended on the spot. The name of petitioner transpired in the case on the confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18321 of 2021(3) dt.27-10-2021 2/2 statement of co-accused during investigation of the case. Petitioner was not put on T.I. Parade No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. He was remanded in this case from another case on 20.10.2020. Petitioner has two criminal antecedent, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, as such, prayer for bail of the petitioner named above is hereby rejected. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T