Jago Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8605 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-122 Year-2025 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== 1.
Jago Devi W/o Nathuni Sah Resident of Village- Mohiuddinpur, Rajwa, P.S.- Bangra, Dist.- Samastipur 2.
Pinki Devi @ Pinki Kumari W/o Dinesh Kumar Resident of VillageMohiuddinpur, Rajwa, P.S.- Bangra, Dist.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 118(1), 303(2), 308(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, Petitioner No. 1, namely Jago Devi, assaulted brother of informant, namely Saurabh Kumar, with iron rod and Petitioner No. 2, namely Pinki Devi, assaulted mother-in-law of informant with iron rod.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8605 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of petty dispute, maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. Petitioners are ladies and claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Samastipur in connection with N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 122 of 2025,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8605 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T