Shyam Lal Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17733 of 2016 ====================================================== Shyam Lal Ravidas S/O Late Uchit Ravidas, resident of New Officers Colony, Barmasia, New Pole Factory, P.S. & District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary, Primary Education, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Programme Officer, Establishment, District- Katihar.
5. The District Education Officer, Katihar.
6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block- Katihar, District- Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate Mr. Suresh Prasad Sah @ Baranwal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra- SC16 Mr. Promod Kumar Singh, Ac to Sc-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2018 Heard Mr. Sandeep Kumar learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar submits that the petitioner is recipient of national award and as such under the policy decision of the Government the petitioner is entitled to extension of three years of service as national awardees are entitled to extension of three years of service but unfortunately respondents are acting contrary to the policy decision and petitioner has not been extended benefit of this policy decision. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.2 who shall see that final decision
Patna High Court CWJC No.17733 of 2016(2) dt.31-01-2018 2/2 with regard to grant of benefit under the policy decision for national awardee is extended to the petitioner, the respondent no.2 is under obligation to take final decision in the light of the policy decision of the Government within a maximum period of sixty days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.
It is needless to state here that in case the petitioner is found entitled to extension of service in view of the policy decision, all consequential benefit must reach the petitioner within a further period of one month from the date of such decision by the respondents.
With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U