← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46791/2015bail granted

Rabindra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-12Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46791 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -111 Year- 2014 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ====================================================== Rabindra Yadav, Son of Ram Jatan Yadav, Resident of Village - Narayan Bigha, P.S.- Tekari, District - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Advocate.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mr. C.Sen Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 111 of 2014, registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that the petitioner and other co-accused were seen by the informant moving behind her husband in course of carrying the bundle of wheat and, thereafter, the husband of the informant did not return, except that there is nothing against the petitioner. Moreover, petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2015, while he is an accused

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46791 of 2015 (3) dt.12-02-2016 2/2 in Konch P.S. Case No. 80 of 2015, but he is on bail in the said case.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M-III at Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 111 of 2014. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T