Patna High CourtCWJC/20247/2016disposed

R. P. S. Teachers Training College v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-09Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20247 of 2016 ====================================================== R. P. S. Teachers Training College, New Bailey Road, Danapur, Patna, Bihar through its Secretary Mahesh Prasad Singh, Son of Late Dineshwar Prasad Singh.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director (Research & Training), Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Magadh University, Bodhgaya, District- Gaya through its Registrar.

5. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodhgaya, District- Gaya.

6. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodhgaya, Gaya.

7. National Council for Teachers Education, Eastern Regional Committee, 15 Nilkanth Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar (Orissa) through its Regional Director.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Adv. Mr. Prince Kr. Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 Mr. Sunil Kr. Singh, Adv.

Mr. Grijesh Kumar, Adv.

======================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CWJC No.20247 of 2016 (2) dt.09-05-2017 2/2 this writ application has become infructuous inasmuch as the inspection of the Training College, running B.Ed. course, has already been done on 28.04.2017 and other disputes, therefore, have become academic.

Considering the submission as above, this application is disposed of as the relief/s, sought for in the present writ application, having become infructuous.

It goes without saying that the petitioner shall have the liberty to question the report of the Inspecting Team, if adverse, in an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Praveen-II/- U