Rana Pratap Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11998 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-981 Year-2022 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rana Pratap Yadav son of Sri Surendra Yadav @ Surendra prasad Yadav Village- Katgenwa Ps- Mahuawaa Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 981 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Prosecution case in short is that five unknown miscreants entered into the Instakart Services Pvt. Ltd. at Deoraha Baba Chowk and on the pistol point looted an amount to the tune of Rs. 5,79,898/-.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 07-11-2023. Petitioner bears two criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11998 of 2024(2) dt.27-02-2024 2/2 5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. From perusal of the impugned order, it would manifest from paragraph No. 6 that name of the petitioner has been surfaced in this case due to confessional statement of coaccused, namely, Abhishek Mani Tripathy, and the same has no evidentiary value. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. parade has been conducted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and manner of implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 981 of 2022.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T