Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9406 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-579 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

RANJEET KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ RANJEET KUMAR Son of Late Niranjan Kumar Choudhary @ Niranjan Choudhary Resident of village - Bagwara, Ward No.- 3, P.S.- Mufassil (Singhaul O.P.), District - Begusarai. 2.

Randheer Kumar Choudhary @ Randhir Kumar Son of Late Niranjan Kumar Choudhary @ Niranjan Choudhary Resident of village - Bagwara, Ward No.- 3, P.S.- Mufassil (Singhaul O.P.), District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.) P.S. Case No.579 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(b), 337, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner No.1, Ranjeet Kumar Choudhary in drunken state misbehaved with the informant. Petitioner No.2, Randheer Kumar Choudhary is said to have assaulted the informant by means of Pagharia on her head causing head injury. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9406 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 that the land of the petitioner is situated near the house of the informant and the informant used the land of the petitioners as path. It is submitted that the informant used to destroy the vegetable crops of the petitioners. When the petitioners objected, the informant has filed this false case. It is further submitted that the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Considering the fact that the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.) P.S. Case No.579 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) S.KUMAR/- U T