Abhisekh Kumar @ Pranave Kumar @ Pranav Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8700 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2022 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Abhisekh Kumar @ Pranave Kumar @ Pranav Kumar S/O Ram Binod Singh @ Binod Kumar Singh R/O Village-Mahthi, P.S.-Bibhutipur, District-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, fired upon informant but luckily, he saved himself.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8700 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to village politics. The present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of 11 days and there is no plausible explanation for the same which itself makes the entire prosecution case doubtful. Though, petitioner is alleged to have fired but no one has sustained any fire arm injuries. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, delay in lodging of the F.I.R., fact that no one has sustained any fire arm injury and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosera
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8700 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 P.S. Case No. 93 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T