← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16806/2020dismissed

Vikash Kumar @ Vikkee v. The State Of Bihar

2020-07-08Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16806 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2018 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKKEE Son of Ram Badan Paswan Resident of Ward No.14, Deshari, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Distt- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Basant Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-07-2020 This case has been heard through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case as lodged by the informant is that her daughter Rubi Kumari was married with the petitioner about six years ago but due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry, she has been killed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that due to quarreling between the husband and wife this occurrence took place. He further submits that petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16806 of 2020(3) dt.08-07-2020 2/2 languishing in judicial custody since 08.10.2018. Considering the fact that petitioner is the husband of the deceased, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his payer for bail is rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 95 of 2019 arising out of Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 280 of 2018 pending before the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Rosera, Samastipur. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. However, trial court is directed to conclude the trail within six months. Petitioner is at liberty to new his prayer for bail after six months if trial is not concluded within the said period. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T