Patna High CourtMJC/1536/2012disposed

Ram Chandra Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-02-09Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.1536 of 2012 dt.09-02-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1536 of 2012 =========================================================== RAMCHANDRA TIWARI, S/O LATE KAMAL TIWARI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE MADHUBANIGHAT, P.S. MOTIHARI, MUFASSIL, DISTRICT EAST CHAMPARAN.

.... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, BIAHR, PATNA..

2. SRI ANUP MUKHERJEE, CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR, PATNA.

3. SRI ABHIJIT SINHA, COLLECTOR, EAST CHAMPARAN AT MOTIHARI.

4. SRI RADHA KANT, SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, MOTIHARI, SADAR.

5. SRI ARUN KUMAR RAI, THE THEN CIRCLE OFFICER, CIRCLE MOTIHARI, DISTT. EAST CHAMPARAN.

6. SRI SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, THE CIRCLE OFFICER, MOTIHARI, DISTT. EAST CHAMPARAN.

7. AMLEDU KR. RANJAN, S/O NOT KNOWN, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT ROAD, DIVISION, DHAKA, EAST CHAMPARAN.

.... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH For the Respondent/s : Mr. ASHOK KUMAR KESHRI AAG11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-02-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to A.A.G. 11 for the State are present.

Learned counsel for the State submits that in compliance of the order dated 30.09.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15530 of 2010, which is under contempt, the encroachment in respect to Khesra No. 2870 as detailed in order under contempt has been removed, which would appear from paragraph 5 of the supplementary show cause dated 24.06.2013, which has also been

Patna High Court MJC No.1536 of 2012 dt.09-02-2015 admitted by the petitioner in reply to the 4th supplementary show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 5. Since the direction, under contempt, has already been complied with, therefore, no further action is required. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U