Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8415 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2021 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR SON OF KAMESHWAR YADAV R/O VILLAGEBHAURA RAMNAGAR, P.S.- SHANKARPUR, DISTRICT- MADHEPURA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :Mrs. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-06-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code Allegations against the petitioner and other miscreants are said to have committed loot of Rs. 73,000/- from the informant by intercepting his motorcycle and also snatched Samsung Mobile from the pocket.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has also accused in three cases out of which two cases are of similar nature. The petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8415 of 2022(2) dt.29-06-2022 2/2 Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021, with following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors must be close relative of the petitioner.

(2) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled.

(3) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, his bail bond is liable to be cancelled. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) sanjeev/- U T