Arun Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46338 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2015 Thana -MALI District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Arun Yadav,

2. Vinod Yadav, Both sons of Prasad Yadav, resident of Village- Parmeshwari, P.S.- Mali, District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 12-10-2015 This is an application, made under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accused-petitioners, namely, Arun Yadav and Vinod Yadav, in connection with Mali Police Station Case No. 25 of 2015, under Sections 452/324/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the above application and materials on record. Heard Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Akbar Ali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State.

In view of the fact that petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 are in custody since 13.08.2015 and 18.08.2015 respectively and charge sheet has been submitted in connection with the case aforementioned and perusal of the materials available does not reveal such incriminating materials, which would warrant further detention of the accused-petitioners in custody, and in view also of the fact that the perusal of the materials does not reveal that the accusedpetitioners' liberty on bail would adversely affect their trial, it is, in the interest

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46338 of 2015 (2) dt.12-10-2015 2/2 of justice, hereby directed that the accused above-named shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties each, each of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Mali Police Station Case No. 25 of 2015. This direction for bail is further subject to the condition that the accused above-named shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence and shall appear, in the learned Court below, as may be directed.

In terms of the above observations and directions, this bail application shall stand disposed of.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) Mkr./- U