← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8221/2025bail rejected

Md. Dilkash @ Dilkas v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-14Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8221 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2024 Thana- PALASI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Dilkash @ Dilkas Son of Md. Budhana Resident of Village- Pipra Bejwad, Ward No. 07, P.S.- Palasi, Distt.- Araria ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bibi Gulshan D/O- Mohsin Resident of Village- Karor Dighali, Ward No. 06, P.S.- Palasi, Distt.- Araria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kishore Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, A.P.P.

Mr. UK Gupta, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and opposite party no.2.

2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, this petitioner along with others kidnapped daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. victim was medically examined and no sign of physical relation was found on her body. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State and opposite party no.2 oppose the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for opposite

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8221 of 2025(4) dt.14-05-2025 2/2 party no.2 submits that the victim in her statement recorded under section 183 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has supported the prosecution case. Court has assessed her age to be 16 years.

6. Considering the nature and gravity of allegation and aforesaid statement of the victim, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T