Ajit @ Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18420 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2020 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

AJIT @ AJIT KUMAR Son of Nandjee @ Nandjee Ram Resident of Village - Kastar, Police Station - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas. 2.

Laljee @ Laljee Singh @ Brij Kishor Singh Son of Mathura @ Mathura Singh @ Mathura Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Kastar, Police Station - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas.

3.

Raju @ Raju Kumar @ Mithlesh Kumar Singh Son of Laljee @ Laljee Singh @ Brij Kishore Singh Resident of Village - Kastar, Police Station - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas.

4.

Ranjan @ Akhilesh Kumar Singh Son of Laljee @ Laljee Singh @ Brij Kishor Singh Resident of Village - Kastar, Police Station - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas.

5.

Shiv Mangal @ Shiv Mangal Singh Son of Mathura @ Mathura Singh @ Mathura Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Kastar, Police Station - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas.

6.

Harendra @ Harendra Kumar Singh Son of Bhagalu @ Tulsi Singh Resident of Village - Kastar, Police Station - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas. 7.

Ram babu @ Ramesh Prasad Singh Son of Mathura @ Mathura Singh @ Mathura Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Kastar, Police Station - Bikramganj, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The state of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 92/2020 registered for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18420 of 2021(2) dt.03-12-2021 2/2 offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioners, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T