Ranjan Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44267 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -359 Year- 2014 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== Ranjan Das Son of Kishun Das resident of Mohalla- Makewara Chhoti Khanjharpur, P.S.- Barari, District- Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Janki Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the State : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2015 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. None appears for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S. Case No.359 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 354, 324, 452, 379, 427, 504, 50, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is urged on behalf of the petitioner that though the petitioner is named in the First Information Report but there is no specific allegation of assault by him. Allegation against him is that he was the order giver. Petitioner claims to be in custody since 13.6.2014.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner namely Ranjan Das be released on bail on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44267 of 2014 (2) dt.04-02-2015 2/2 his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in Kotwali (Adampur) P.S. Case No.359 of 2014 with a condition that one of the bailors must be his father. Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in similar nature of case, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. Further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial in the court below. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) N.H./- U T