Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8706 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2021 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Prince Kumar Son Of Shailendra Prasad Resident Of Village- Ichos, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda.

2.

Ankit Kumar Son Of Kaushlendra Prasad Resident Of Village- Ichos, P.S.- Islmapur, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shyamal Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 353, 307, 308, 427, 337, 436, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific accusation either of abusing the police party or brick batting upon them or prevention from their official duties or fighting

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8706 of 2022(3) dt.30-08-2022 2/2 with the members of other group. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that during brick batting none had sustained injuries and as such there are no injuries reports of the injured on record of this case. He further submits that petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent whereas petitioner no. 1 has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Islampur P.S. Case No. 166 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T