Dr. Jagdish Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govern

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3140 of 2017 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11455 of 2006 =========================================================== Dr. Jagdish Prasad, S/o Late Banarsi Prasad, Resident of Village- Pipra, P.O.- Dumri, District- Begusarai- 851117.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Sri R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri R.I. Chongthu, The Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. Sri S.K. Singh, The Vice Chancellor of L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

4. Mr. Mustafa Kamal Ansari, The Registrar of L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

5. Sri Ram Babu Sah, The Finance Officer of L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga.

6. Sri Awdhesh Singh, The Principal, G.D. College, Begusarai. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG 15 For L N Mithila University : Mr. ArunKumar Prasad =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-01-2018 Inter alia, contending that an order passed on 11.05.2011 in CWJC No. 11455 of 2006 has not been complied with, this application has been filed for initiating action for contempt. The writ petition was disposed of by an innocuous order directing the respondents to settled the undisputed claim of the petitioner. The respondents have settled the claim of the petitioner at an amount as per their calculation. According to the petitioner, the

Patna High Court MJC No.3140 of 2017 dt.24-01-2018 2/2 calculation contained in Annexure-3 to the writ original writ petition was the undisputed amount and this amount has not been paid till date.

According to the petitioner, the undisputed amount is more than 23 lacs and he has been paid a sum less than the aforesaid amount, i.e. about 14 lacs.

Taking note of the fact that undisputed amount as per the calculation made by the respondents has been paid, now in the facts and circumstances, I see no reason to make any indulgence. In case the petitioner feels that amount as per his calculation and entitlement have not been done and paid, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to claim it afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) mrl./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date25.01.2018 Transmission Date