Mantu Pd. Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47130 of 2015 Arising Out of Pattori PS.Case No. -283 Year- 2015 Thana - PATORI District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Mantu Pd. Yadav, Son of Vishwanath Rai, Resident of Village:- Darba, P.S.:- Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District:- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.K.Chaudhary(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 16-10-2015 This is an application, made under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accusedpetitioner, namely, Mantu Pd. Yadav, in connection with Pattori Police Station Case No. 283 of 2015, under Sections 420/467/414/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perused the above application and materials on record.

Heard Mr. Dilip Kumar Roy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. A.K.Chaudhary, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State. In view of the fact that the accused above-named has been in custody since 14.07.2015 in connection with the case aforementioned and though charge sheet has been submitted, trial has not yet commenced and perusal of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47130 of 2015 (2) dt.16-10-2015 materials available on record does not reveal such incriminating materials, which would warrant further detention of the accused-petitioner in custody, and in view also of the fact that the perusal of the materials does not reveal that the accused-petitioner's liberty on bail would adversely affect his trial, it is, in the interest of justice, hereby directed that the accused above-named shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, each of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Pattori Police Station Case No. 283 of 2015.

This direction for bail is further subject to the condition that the accused above-named shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence and shall appear, in the learned Court below, as may be directed. In terms of the above observations and directions, this bail application shall stand disposed of. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) A.I./- U