Sanjeet Kamat @ Sanjeet Kumar Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8865 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2022 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

SANJEET KAMAT @ SANJEET KUMAR KAMAT Son of Nunu Kamat Resident of Village- Koilakh, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. 2.

Satrughan Ray @ Satrughan Kumar Ray Son of Late Mohan Ray Resident of Village- Koilakh, P.S.- Rajnagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273 of I.P.C. and Sections 30(a), 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that 3992.760 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and there is no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8865 of 2022(2) dt.04-03-2022 2/3 allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The names of the petitioners have transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by the local Chaukidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 3992.760 liters wine is recovered from the truck. The petitioners are not the owner of the truck in question. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.

I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in connection with Rajnagar P.S. case No.02/2022 corresponding to G.R. No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8865 of 2022(2) dt.04-03-2022 3/3 under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T