← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8704/2020bail granted

Angad Bind v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-28Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8704 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-403 Year-2019 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

ANGAD BIND S/o Ram Ashish Bind R/o village- Rangpur, P.S.- Darigaon, Distt.- Rohtas 2.

Manorma Devi W/o Angad Bind R/o village- Rangpur, P.S.- Darigaon, Distt.- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jai Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 403 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POSCO Act. The allegation is regarding the co-accused person, namely, Bablu Kumar, having kidnapped the minor victim girl, who is the daughter of the informant, with the intention of marrying her and it is alleged that the petitioners had helped. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are uncle and aunt of the said co-accused person,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8704 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 2/3 namely, Bablu Kumar and have got nothing to do with the alleged incident, which would be borne out from the fact that the petitioners were given a clean chit by the police and final form was submitted qua the petitioners herein, however, later on, the learned court below by an order dated 26.7.2019 had differed from the opinion of the police and taken cognizance for the offences alleged as against the petitioners herein as well. The petitioners are stated to be having a clean antecedent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as also taking into account the fact that the police has found the case to be untrue as against the petitioners, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioners to the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Session Judge 1st Rohtas Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (Darigaon) P.S. Case No. 403 of 2019,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8704 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U T