← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17921/2016disposed

Ramesh Kumar Singh @ Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-08-05Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17921 of 2016 ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar Singh @ Ramesh Kumar S/o Late Ramnagina Singh Resident of village - Chapan, P.O. and P.S. Mohiuddin Nagar, District Samastipur At Present Village - Bhawanchak, P.O. Saksohara, P.S. Bhadaur, District Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Old Secretary 3.

The District Magistrate Cum Collector District Patna 4.

The District Land Acquisition officer, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha- SC19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for direction to the respondents to make payment of adequate compensation amount of soil used from land of Petitioner for Construction of Saksohara Harnaut road;

(ii) for direction to the respondents to make payment of adequate Compensation amount of acquired land of petitioner for the purpose of widening and Construction of Saksohara Harnaut road after re-

Patna High Court CWJC No.17921 of 2016(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 measurment;

(iii) for any other relief or reliefs to which petitioner may be found entitled.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be pursuing the remedy before the District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna (respondent no.4) with regard to his grievance.

4. Learned State counsel has no objection.

5. In view of the limited prayer, the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the concerned respondent as recorded above.

6. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U