Jay Krishna Yadav @ Jai Kishun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50135 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -257 Year- 2014 Thana -SALKHUA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Jay Krishna Yadav @ Jai Kishun Yadav Son of Late Jagrup Yadav Residing of Kanjari, P.S. Beldour, District - Khagaria..... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Meeta Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 257 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Sections 364/34 and Section 302/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code Allegedly, the husband of the informant had gone to Saharsa Court with co-accused Dinesh Yadav, but he did not return and it is alleged that Dinesh Yadav with the help of the petitioner and anothers have made the husband of the informant traceless with bad intention. During investigation the dead body of the husband of the informant was recovered buried in the land of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50135 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 2 / 2 Gajendra Yadav.

Submission is of false implication and that in this case similarly situated other co-accused namely Mohim Lal Rajak @ Mahil Lal Rajak and Anant Yadav have already been allowed bail vide Cri. Misc. No. 25229 of 2015 and Cri. Misc. No. 20904 of 2015 to which the learned APP does not dispute. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner Jai Krishna Yadav @ Jai Kishun Yadav is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri S.Kumar J.M., 1st Class, Saharsa, arising out of Salkhua P.S. Case No. 257 of 2014 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

Rajiv/- (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) U T