Sudhir Kumar Ojha @ Sudhir Ojha, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4383 of 2025 ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar Ojha @ Sudhir Ojha, Son of Late Krishna Deo Ojha, Resident of Village - Lahladpur, Patahi, P.S. - Mithanpura, Dist. - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, New Delhi.
3.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Environment, Forest and Climate Change Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna, Patna.
4.
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
6.
The Divisional Forest Officer, Gaya Forest Division, Gaya, Bihar. 7.
The Conservator of Forest, Gaya division, Gaya, Bihar. 8.
The Commissioner, Gaya division, Gaya, Bihar. 9.
The District Forest Officer, Gaya, Bihar.
10.
The Addl. Chief Secretary, Vigilance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 11.
The D.G., Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bipin Chandra, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Adv.
For the Accountant General : Mr. Arun Kumar Arun, Adv.
For the Vigilance Department : Mr. Anil Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
Patna High Court CWJC No.4383 of 2025 dt.02-05-2025 2/2 Date : 02-05-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. This petition has been filed for the reason that the respondents have failed to take concrete steps to examine the misappropriation of funds in the garb of beautifying and renovating the New Nursery Udayan, Gaya.
3. The allegations are vague and general and not supported by documents to indicate that there was any misappropriation or diversion of funds.
4. In the absence of such specific materials, no decision can be given in this petition.
5. The petition stands dismissed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 05.05.2025 Transmission Date N/A