Patna High CourtCWJC/14374/2016disposed

Ramanuj Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-07Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14374 of 2016 =========================================================== Ramanuj Prasad, Son of Late Rameshwar Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- Virkuwar Singh Colony (South), P.S- Hajipur (Town), District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.

4. The District Education Officer, Vaishali.

5. The District Progrmme Officer (Establishment), Vaishali.

6. The Block Education Officer, Block- Lalganj, District- Vaishali. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Subhash Chandra Mishra, S.C. 16 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 07-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. After some arguments, leaned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the relief prayed in the present writ application, he has also moved before the respondent no. 4 on 07.07.2016. He submitted that till date the same has still not been disposed off.

3. Learned counsel for the State submitted that the same shall be disposed off expeditiously.

4. In view the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 4 to consider the

Patna High Court CWJC No.14374 of 2016 dt.07-08-2017 2/2 representation filed by the petitioner, copy of which has been made Annexure-11 to the writ application, expeditiously and in any case within two months from the date of production of a copy of this order before him.

5. It goes without saying that all the issue raised by the petitioner shall be considered in accordance with law before passing a final reasoned order. Further, if it is held in favour of the petitioner, consequential action shall also be taken in accordance with law expeditiously.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR U