← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16946/2017dismiss for nonprosecution

Jagarnath Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

2025-06-23Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16946 of 2017 ====================================================== Jagarnath Singh Son of Late Ramadhar Singh, Resident of Village- Khajura, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India and Ors null null 2.

The Ministry of Railways, through the Chief Project Manager, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation 3.

The Assistant Project Manager, Dedicated Freight Corridor, Rail Project Mugalsarai, Sone Nagar Bloc 4.

The Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development and Land Resources Department, Government of India, Ni 5.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reform, Bihar, Patna 6.

The Commissioner-cum-Arbitrator, Patna Division, Patna. 7.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Kaimur Bhabua. 8.

The Competent Authority-cum-District-Land Acquisition Officer, DistrictKaimur Bhabua. 9.

The Superintending Engineer, Department of Building Construction, Building Circle, Ara, District- B 10.

The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Bhabua, District- Kaim ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad - Gp14 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2025 Let the name of the lawyers who now have been elevated to Bench be deleted.

2. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.

3. The counter affidavit of the State is on record according to which, a decision has already been taken by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16946 of 2017(2) dt.23-06-2025 2/2 office of the Collector, Patna on 19.05.2017.

4. Learned State Counsel, Mr. Dhurjati Kumar Prasad submits that if aggrieved, the petitioner should have approached before the Competent Civil Court instead of knocking the doors of Patna High Court.

5. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, dismissed for non-appearance.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U