← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10261/2020dismissed

Seema Khatun @ Seema v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-10Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10261 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-528 Year-2019 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Seema Khatun @ Seema Wife of Ranjeet Sah Resident of Village - Nageshwar Bag, Khushakibag, P.S.- Purnea East, District - Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kapil Deo Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amarendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through the virtual court proceeding.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. He submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10261 of 2020(4) dt.10-01-2022 2/2 possession of the petitioner. He submits that petitioner has been made accused on the confessional statement of co-accused. He further submits that petitioner has three criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Purnea Sadar P.S. Case No. 528 of 2019. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below in accordance with law. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T