Archana Kumari And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 10759 of 2012 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -0 Year- null Thana -null District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ===========================================================

1. Archana Kumari D/O Prof. Vidya Sagar R/O Hilsa ( Town ), P.S. Hilsa, District - Nalanda

2. Pankaj Kumar S/O Prof. Vidya Sagar R/O Hilsa ( Town ), P.S. Hilsa, District - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Rana Baljit Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Ms Meena Singh, APP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that only general and omnibus allegations have been made against the petitioners who are Nanad and Devar respectively of the victim. Learned counsel for the complainant pointed out, with reference to paragraphs 6 and 13 of the complaint petition that specific allegations have been made against the two petitioners and, as such, there is no ground for quashing the order dated 11.06.2010 taking cognizance of the offence under Sections 498A, 406, 323, 379, 504/34 of Indian Penal code.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10759 of 2012 dt.14-03-2018 2/2 On going through the complaint petition, this Court finds that there is sufficient material to arrive at a prima facie conclusion for taking cognizance and, as such, the order taking cognizance, impugned in the instant petition, does not suffer from any infirmity. This application is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 14.03.2018 Transmission Date 14.03.2018