Abhimanyu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10048 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2025 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Abhimanyu Yadav S/o Raman Rai @ Raman Ray Resident of VillageSapgadha, PS- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Renuka Ratnakar (App 125) For the Informant :

Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State; and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 360 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, unknown persons are said to have killed the deceased. Subsequently, during investigation, a child witness aged about 9 years, who is the son of the deceased, has named the petitioner along with others as the perpetrators of the crime.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10048 of 2026(6) dt.01-07-2026 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 24.09.2025.

5. Per contra, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submit that the allegations against the petitioner are serious and grave in nature. It is contended that there exists prima facie material against the petitioner indicating his involvement in the commission of the offence.

6. Considering the nature and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands dismissed.

8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T