Rajmani Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8223 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Rajmani Devi aged about 64 years, Wife of Late Akshaywat Sharma, Resident of Panduki, Paruki, Aurangabad, DistrictAurangabad.

2. Yashoda Devi, Wife of Shivnandan Mahto, Resident of Alapana Colony, Rajaswa Gram, Dinapur- cum- Khagaul, Patna, DistrictPatna.

3. Shila Devi, Wife of Late Gopal Prasad, Resident of Ashok Rajpath, Sampatchak, Patna, District Patna.

4. Daulati Devi, Wife of Late Lal Babu, Resident of Pakka Kuan, Bhanwar Pokhar, Arya Kumar Road, Patna, Bankipur, District Patna.

5. Kaushlya Devi, Wife of Dina Nath Pandit, Resident of VillageNavratanpur, Kankarbagh, Patna, District- Patna.

6. Prem Lata @ Prem Lata Devi, Wife of Late Amir Chand, Resident of House No. 2901, Tajpur Road, E.W.S. Colony, Ludhiana Central Post Office, Punjab.

7. Hemawati Devi, Wife of Late Ram Ishwar Singh, Resident of 5 Boring Road, Panitanki, Srikrishnapuri, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Patna Municipal Corporation through Municipal Commissioner, Maurya Lok, Patna.

3. The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rupak Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Yogendra Pd. Sinha- Aag7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 03-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna Municipal Corporation.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that part of their grievance has been redressed by order dated 29.10.2018

Patna High Court CWJC No.8223 of 2018(2) dt.03-12-2018 2/2 issued in the case of those persons whose family pension had been stopped since five years and it has been decided that family pension be paid to such beneficiaries of the dead employees w.e.f. 01.10.2018. He submits that a rider has been also imposed while granting family pension w.e.f. 01.10.2018 that the said beneficiaries would not claim arrears of family pension which he proposes to challenge.

Since the other relief has already been redressed vide order dated 29.10.2018 issued by the Additional Municipal Commissioner, Establishment, Patna Municipal Corporation, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to challenge the part of the order by which the petitioner is aggrieved. Let the order dated 29.10.2018 issued by the Additional Municipal Commissioner, Establishment, Patna Municipal Corporation be taken on record.

(Nilu Agrawal, J) devendra/- U