Pushpa Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8336 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Pushpa Devi, Wife of Late Pankaj Prasad Singh, resident of 166 Purani Jakkanpur, Patna, Patna G.P.O., Patna.
2. Parvati Devi, Wife of Late Vishunadhari Das @ Vishunadhari Ravidas, resident of 150, Prathamik Vidyalaya, Kaushal Nagar, Western Kaushal Nagar, Village Kaushal Naga, Anchal Patna Sadar, District Patna.
3. Kalavati Devi, Wife of Late Satya Narayan Mahto, resident of Bazar Samiti Road, New Bahadurpur, Rajendra Nagar, near Shiv Kali Durga Mandir, Sampatchak, Patna.
4. Draupadi Devi, Wife of Late Bhola @ Bhola Ram, resident of 69 Nand Nagar, Sampatchak, Rajendra Nagar, Patna.
5. Sushila Devi, Wife of Late Rajendra Prasad, resident of Machua Toli, Machali Market near Arya Kumar Road, District Patna.
6. Rekha Devi, Wife of Late Ramji @ Ramji Ram, resident of Machhua Toli, Kadamkuan, Police Station Kadamkuan, District Patna.
7. Lila Devi, Wife of Late Mahendra @ Mahendra Ram, resident of Nala Road, Ambedkar Bhawan, Police Station Kadamkuan, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, New Secretariat, Patna.
2. The Patna Municipal Corporation through Municipal Commissioner, Maurya Lok, Patna.
3. The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Maurya Lok, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rupak Kumar, Adv.
For the P.M.C. :
Ms. Archana Palkar Khopde, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 03-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna Municipal Corporation.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that part of their grievance has been redressed by order dated 29.10.2018
Patna High Court CWJC No.8336 of 2018(2) dt.03-12-2018 2/2 issued in the case of those persons whose family pension had been stopped since five years and it has been decided that family pension be paid to such beneficiaries of the dead employees w.e.f. 01.10.2018. He submits that a rider has been also imposed while granting family pension w.e.f. 01.10.2018 that the said beneficiaries would not claim arrears of family pension which he proposes to challenge.
Since the other relief has already been redressed vide order dated 29.10.2018 issued by the Additional Municipal Commissioner, Establishment, Patna Municipal Corporation, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the part of the order for which the petitioner is aggrieved.
Let the order dated 29.10.2018 issued by the Additional Municipal Commissioner, Establishment, Patna Municipal Corporation be taken on record.
(Nilu Agrawal, J) devendra/- U