← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7500/2025bail granted

Hirdya Nat v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-08Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7500 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-680 Year-2024 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Hirdya Nat Son of Raj Nath Nat Resident of Village - Ghoghwaliya, Police Station - Kopa, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 680 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 310(2) of the BNS.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that 4-5 miscreants looted informant's cash amounting to Rs. 2,75,000/- on gun point and one of the miscreants assaulted on his head by butt of a gun due to which he sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case during investigation and the looted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7500 of 2025(3) dt.08-05-2025 2/2 motorcycle is alleged to have been recovered from this petitioner. Except motorcycle, no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the motorcycle in question. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 680 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T