← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51400/2015dismissed

Satish Yadav @ Satish @ Chhatish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-11-10Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51400 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2015 Thana -PAKARIBARAW District- NAWADA ====================================================== Satish Yadav @ Satish @ Chhatish Yadav, Son of Parmeshwar Yadav, Resident of Village- Turukwan, P.S.- Dhamaul (Pakaribrawan, DistrictNawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pronati Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-11-2015 Heard Sri Jitendra Kumar Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.

The petitioner, who is in custody in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 48 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 29.7.2015. He further submits that of- course in the F.I.R. it was alleged that the petitioner in the occurrence had used Farsa , but in the F.I.R. there was no specific accusation as to who gave blow on which part of the body of the informant. He further submits that there was one incised injury found on the head of the informant but that injury

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51400 of 2015 (2) dt.10-11-2015 2/2 was found simple in nature. On the aforesaid grounds he makes a prayer for grant of bail.

Besides hearing I have perused the materials available on record particularly the F.I.R. In the F.I.R. there is specific accusation against the petitioner that he had demanded rangdari of Rs. 50,000/- prior to the occurrence and due to non fulfillment the petitioner along with others had assaulted the informant.

In view of nature of accusation I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of bail.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T