Hem Chandra Himkar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1761 of 2023 ====================================================== Hem Chandra Himkar Son of Sri Girishdeo Tiwari, Resident of VillageTiwari Chakiya, P.O.- Hussepur, P.S.- Bhore, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Buddha Marg, Patna.

2.

The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Buddha Marg, Patna.

3.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Saran Division, Chapra. 4.

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj. 6.

The Zila Parishad, Gopalganj, through the Chief Executive Officer-cumAdditional Collector, Gopalganj. 7.

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad-cum-Additional Collector, Gopalganj.

8.

Sri Kumar Brajesh alleged to be In-charge Headmaster, Panchauat High School-cum-Inter College, Mishar Batarahan, Block-Phulwaria, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha, GP 27 For the Resp. No. 6&7 :

Mr.Satya Prakash Tripathy, Advocate (Zila Parishad, Gopalganj) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Zila Parishad, Gopalganj.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with liberty to approach the District Teacher Appellate Authority under the provisions of the Bihar State School Teachers and Employees (Dispute Redressal)

Patna High Court CWJC No.1761 of 2023(2) dt.20-06-2023 2/2 Rules, 2015.

Mr. Prabhakar Jha, learned GP-27 for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent nos. 6 & 7 have no objection to the petitioner seeking alternative statutory remedy before the Tribunal.

Permission is granted.

This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail his remedy before an appropriate forum in accordance with law. If any question of limitation would arise, the learned Tribunal shall consider the period spent by the petitioner to this Court in accordance with law. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.) Rajeev/- U