Rudal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20452 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2020 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== RUDAL SINGH SON OF LATE VIKKI SINGH R/O VILLAGE- HARDIYA, P.S.- CHAUTHAM, DISTRICT- KHAGARIA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narayan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Chautham P.S. Case No. 337 of 2020 GR No. 3681 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable punishable under Section 30(a), 37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

20 litres of semi-formed liquor which has been destroyed at the place of occurrence and two litres of Mahua liquor has been recovered from the house of this petitioner. It is submitted that no recovery has been made from conscious possession of this petitioner. Recovery has been made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20452 of 2021(2) dt.14-07-2021 2/2 from the house which is in joint possession of family. Petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2020.

Considering the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-2nd-cum-Special Judge Excise, Khagaria in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 337 of 2020 and Special BA (Excise) No. 756 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T