← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1340/2018disposed

Nagendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Forest And Environment, Patna, Na

2019-11-28The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1340 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.386 of 2017 ====================================================== Nagendra Singh, Son of Shiv Pukar Singh, Resident of Village- Nahar Gate, Dehri, P.S.- Dehri, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Forest and Environment, Patna, Namely, Mr. Tripurari Saran 2.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, namely, Mr. Animesh Kumar Parashar.

3.

The Divisional Forest Officer- cum- Authorised Officer, Rohtas, Forest Division, Rohtas at Sasaram, namely, Mr. S. Kumar Sammy. 4.

The Forester, Tilauthu Range, Rohtas, namely Mr. Lallan Mochi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-11-2019 This application is being filed for initiation of a proceeding of Civil Contempt against contemnors/ opposite parties for their willful disobedience and deliberate disregard to the order dated 06.03.2017 passed in L.P.A. No. 386 of 2017. It is not in dispute that there has been delay, inordinate, in complying with the directions issued in terms of order dated 06.03.2017 passed in L.P.A. No. 386 of 2017 (Nagendra Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors). Be that as it may be, it is seen that at this point in

Patna High Court MJC No.1340 of 2018(4) dt.28-11-2019 2/2 time, Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties states that now the authorities have taken appropriate action by passing appropriate order. As such, we dispose of the present application leaving it open to the petitioner to take appropriate remedial action, if so required and desired.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U