Dharmendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16034 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2022 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Dharmendra Yadav, S/O Laldev Yadav R/V- Bijahra, P.S.- Konch, DistrictGaya 2.
Nand Kishore Yadav @ Nandu Yadav, S/O Laldev Yadav R/V- Bijahra, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2023
1. The defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
3. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354(B), 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioners entered his house on account of dispute relating to water and assaulted his daughter-in-laws and tore their blouse and also assaulted the informant.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16034 of 2023(2) dt.20-07-2023 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the occurrence is alleged to have taken on a trivial issue. It is also submitted that there is no specific allegation of committing any overt act against the petitioners and the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that even the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.
6. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Konch P. S. Case No.230 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T