Ram Udagar Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16133 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Ram Udagar Paswan, son of Late Yugul Paswan, Resident of VillageRampur Shankar, P.O. and P.S. Mehsi, District- East Champaran at Motihari.
2. Kanhaiya Singh, son of Ramyash Singh, Resident of VillageBhushalwa, P.O. Rajpur, P.S. Keshariya, District- East Champaran at Motihari.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. null null
2. The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
3. The Engineer-in- Chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
4. The Joint Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
5. The Chief Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Bihar, Bishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
6. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health and Engineering Department, Public Health Engineering Circle, Muzaffarpur.
7. The Executive Engineer (Mechanical), Public Health and Engineering Department, Public Health Mechanical Division, Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arbind Ujjawal - Sc4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 30-04-2018 Heard.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in case they are granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.3 and the respondent no.3 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioners within a specified time frame.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16133 of 2017 (2) dt.30-04-2018 2/2 Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioners shall file a representation before the respondent no.3 regarding their grievances raised in the writ petition within a period of two weeks from today and the respondent no.3 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter, considering the judgment of this Court dated 17.11.2011 passed in CWJC No. 16448 of 2011..
The writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U