Raushan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45402 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -186 Year- 2014 Thana -LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Raushan Thakur, Son of Late Sitaram Thakur, resident of villageSunderpur, Bela, P.S. L.N.M.U., District- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kumar Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 12-03-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-B) a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The allegation against the petitioner is that one loaded country made pistol and cartridge were recovered from his possession while the accused including the petitioner were making plan for committing offence.
It is submitted that no stolen article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The motorcycle belongs to the father of the petitioner. He is in custody since 17.08.2014. After investigation, charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tempering with the evidence.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45402 of 2014 (3) dt.12-03-2015 2/2 The learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has also criminal antecedents.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga at Laherisarai in L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No.186/2014 after framing of charge with the following conditions :
1.
One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.
2.
The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.
3.
The petitioner will be well represented in the court.
4.
In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T