Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10286/2019bail granted

Md. Estiyak Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-20Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10286 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2018 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== MD. ESTIYAK KHAN Son of Md. Mumtaz Khan @ Mumtaz Khan Resident of Village-Isopur, P.S.Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Khatim Reza For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 457 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is recovery of one missed cartridge from the possession of petitioner who was riding the motorcycle and which was his own motorcycle and other person was pillion rider. Petitioner is in custody since 24.09.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10286 of 2019(2) dt.20-02-2019 2/2 S.D.J.M., Danapur, Patna, in connection with Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 457 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T