Samir Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8061 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Samir Alam Son of Pappu Quaraishi @ Md. Pappu Hussain @ Md. Haider @ Pappu Resident of Village - Shankarpur Road, P.S.- Dighwara, District - Saran at Chapra (Bihar).

2.

Irfan @ Irfan Alam Son of Pappu Quaraishi @ Md. Pappu Hussain @ Md. Haider @ Pappu Resident of Village - Shankarpur Road, P.S.- Dighwara, District - Saran at Chapra (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 125(b), 125(a), 324(4), 223, 352, 351(2) and 61(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The case of the prosecution is that due to dispute among the children, there was a scuffle between two parties and in that scuffle, certain persons were injured. It is also alleged that altogether fifteen persons were from one side and eleven

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8061 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/3 persons were from second side armed with lathi and danda and they were abusing each other.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it is not clear as to who has assaulted whom. The name of these petitioners finds in the first group of persons. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Petitioner no. 1 is having criminal antecedent of one case and petitioner no. 2 is having no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 253 of 2025, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8061 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026 3/3 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Saran at Chapra subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of B.N.S.S, (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T