Sushil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9655 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2575 Year-2023 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== Sushil Kumar Son of Kapil Muni Pandey R/o Village - Madhopur Tola, Daubaliya, P.S. - Jalalpur, Dist. - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Manisha Devi W/o Brajendra Kumar Mishra R/o Village - Madhopur Tole, Dudhwaliya, P.S. - Jalalpur, Dist. - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 2575 of 2023, punishable for the offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 477, 420, 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. At the outset, learned A.P.P. for the State submits that process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has already been issued against this petitioner on 18.06.2025 and as such, this anticipatory bail petition is not maintainable, in the light of decisions of the Supreme Court in the case of (Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2012) 8 SCC 730, State of MP v. Pradeep Sharma (2014) 2 SCC 17 and Prem Shankar Prasad v. State

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9655 of 2026(5) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 of Bihar 2021 SCC OnLine SC 955) as also latest decision of Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana vs. Dharamraj in (2023) 17 S.C.C. 510.

4. Considering the aforesaid development, the present anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T