← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1329/2018dismissed

Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Represented Through Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Sitting At Old Secretariate And

2022-12-20Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1329 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar S/o Sri Kedar Prasad, R/o A/P Jitu Lal Lane Chowk Shikarpur, Patnacity, P.S.- Chowk, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Represented Through Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, sitting at Old Secretariate Building Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur, Biahr. 4.

Officer In Charge , Sadar P.S., Muzaffarpur.

5.

Mritunjay Sharma @ Fauzi Sahab, R/o Khabra, D.A.V. School, Girijanandan Nagar, P.S.- Sadar, District - Muzaffarpur. And some unknown persons.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ruchikar Jha, AC to SC- 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 No one appears for the petitioner to press this application.

Prayer of the petitioner is to direct the respondent no. 4 to register a First Information Report against respondent no. 5. Mr. Ruchikar Jha, learned AC to SC-8 submits that on bare perusal of the writ application, it would appear that the petitioner has never approached the police station for lodging of the First Information Report. This Court finds from the writ application that in paragraph '15' of the writ application, the petitioner has stated that he had sent a representation to the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1329 of 2018(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur and the Officerin-Charge of Sadar Police Station, Muzaffarpur, but thereafter there is no statement that the petitioner had followed the further procedure, if the police was not lodging the complaint. It seems that the petitioner has moved this Court directly for lodging of the F.I.R. even otherwise nobody has appeared to press this application.

This application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U