Radhesh Kumar Sharma v. The Union Of India Through The Secretary,Dept. Of Post,Govt.Of India,New Delhi.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.111 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== RADHESH KUMAR SHARMA S/o Late Dhanesh Kumar Sharma Resident of Station Road, Mashrakh, P.O. and P.S.- Mashrakh, Distt- Saran at Chhapra, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY,DEPT. OF POST,GOVT.OF INDIA,NEW DELHI. India.
2.
The Director General, Department of Posts, Govt. of India, New Delhi. Bihar 3.
The Chief Post Master General, Bihar Circle, Patna Bihar 4.
The Post Master General, South Circle, Patna. Bihar 5.
The Post Master General, North Circle, Muzaffarpur Bihar 6.
The Chief Post Master, Patna, G.P.O., Patna Bihar 7.
The Dy. Chief Post Master (Administration), Patna, G.P.O., Patna Bihar 8.
The Sr. Superintendent of Post Officer, Saran Division at Chapra. Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
NONE For the Respondent/s :
Mr. A. K. Pandey Mr. Radhika Raman, CGC Mr. R. T. Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2023
1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application.
2. On the last occasion also, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3. By order, dated 19.07.2023, this Court directed the petitioner to implead the Central Bureau of Investigation as respondent no. 9 and also directed him to serve a copy
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.111 of 2020(8) dt.16-08-2023 2/2 of the entire pleadings, along with counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-Union of India upon learned Counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation within a period of two weeks.
4. From the Office note, it appears that the order dated 19.07.2023 has not been complied inasmuch as the Central Bureau of Investigation has not been impleaded as party-respondent in this case.
5. This application is, accordingly, dismissed as default. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √