Pano Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8899 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2016 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== Pano Sharma, Son of Vakil Sharma @ Vakil Mistri, Resident of Village - Bishariya, P.S.- Falke, Dist.- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 232 of 2016, registered under Section 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that in the evening of 12.10.2016, petitioner came at the shop of he informant, where Kabindra Kumar, son of the informant, was present and made demand of cigarette without payment of money then his son refused to give cigarette, on which, petitioner started to abuse and caused injury at this head through piece of bamboo and fled away. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8899 of 2020(3) dt.02-06-2020 2/2 17.08.2019. Further submission is that the only one injury, as found on the person of son of the informant, is simple in nature and the charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 232 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T