Ravi Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9393 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2018 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna ====================================================== RAVI RAUSHAN KUMAR, aged about 28 years, (M) Son of Ravindra Singh Resident of Village - Bahadurpur Gaun, P.O.- Rajendra Nagar, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 313 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A and 26 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is of recovery of two country made pistol from the joint house of the petitioner and his family members. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. Petitioner is in custody since 21.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9393 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2019 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 2nd, Patna City, in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 313 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) manoj/- U T