← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8465/2022bail granted

Rajeev Singh @ Rajeev Kumar Singh @ Rajiv Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-08Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8465 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2017 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAJEEV SINGH @ RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH @ RAJIV KUMAR SINGH S/O SURENDRA SINGH R/O VILLAGE- GAIGHAT, P.S.- GAIGHAT, DISTRICT- MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case no. 109 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 342, 186, 189, 353, 332, 504, 506, 337, 307, 333, 447, 448 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with other co-accused persons have created hindrance by pelting stones to the police party in discharging the official duty. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He is not named in the FIR. His name appeared in supervision report during investigation. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against him. He was only the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8465 of 2022(2) dt.08-08-2022 2/2 member of the mob. He has got no criminal antecedent. Injury received by the injured is simple in nature. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case no. 109 of 2017, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 15th Muzaffarpur subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U