← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18099/2016disposed

Reyaz Ahmad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18099 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Reyaz Ahmad, son of late Mushtaque Ahmad, resident of villageBhogari, P.S.Majhoulia, District-West Champaran

2. Md. Burhanuddin, son of Md. Zeyaul Haque, resident of villageBhogari, P.S. Majhoulia, District- West Champaran

3. Bakhtiyar Alam, son of Md. Haroon, resident of village Bhogari, P.S. Majhoulia, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna

4. The District Education Officer, West Champaran

5. District Programme Officer (Estab) West Champaran

6. Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, 5, Vidyapati Marg, Patna-1.

7. The Chairman, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, 5, Vidyapati Marg, Patna-1.

8. The Secretary,Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, 5, Vidyapati Marg, Patna-1.

9. Afroz Alam son of late Azizur Rahman, resident of village Bathna, P.O. Birwan, P.S. Majhoulia, District- West Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Obaidur Rahman, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP23 For Madarsa Board :

Mr. Rashid Alam, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 06-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, State and the Madarsa Board.

Considering the controversy involved in the instant case the petitioners are directed to approach the Special Director, Secondary Education, respondent No. 3, who shall examine the legality and validity of the claim of the petitioners and on verification of the relevant records and after hearing all

Patna High Court CWJC No.18099 of 2016(3) dt.06-03-2018 2/2 concerned, he is required to pass appropriate order within a maximum period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U